记得在中学的时候语文课老师讲过这样的一句话：“在大家看书的时候，先是越看越厚，然后会越看越薄”
当时的理解是：我会看很多很多的书，但是会随着时间的推移沉淀下来很少很少的一部分知识。
当时感觉知识就像从指缝间溜走的流沙，从身边滑过的时间，一种无力感油然而生。。。
但是我通过这么多年的观察和经验总结，我变得乐观了，书是越看越薄没错，但是“淘尽黄沙始见金”，掌握在自己手中的都是精髓。
重读《结果第一》之前，为了保证重读的质量我在纸上写出了这次重读的目标，其中有一条就是：尝试提炼GTD的精髓。
（这里面用到了我以前提到的两种方法：1.主动阅读-Forgetful-system 2.Boss项的设立-完成目标就成功，没有完成就失败）
我问自己这样的问题：
- 为什么需要Next Action???
- 为什么需要Context???
- 为什么GTD能让我们更高效???
- 为什么需要“2分钟法则”???
- 我认真履行了“自己对自己的承诺”了吗???
- 中西GTD有什么背景上的不同???
- 如何将GTD个性化或者私有化???
有些问题我找到了答案，有些问题的答案还在努力的寻找中，但是每次思考这些问题，都增强了我将GTD进行到底的信心，每次思考这些问题，都对GTD的理念有了新的理解。
GTD并不是一本书《搞定》（《getting things done》）而是一种生活方式（life style）
有些朋友也在思考类似的问题，他们让我重读《结果第一》的时候更有效率，感谢他们。
"Getting it out of your head" would be a close second.
To my mind, everything follows from those two ideas:
-- you use contexts, because they reflect the thinking you've already done
about what resources you need
-- you use next actions, because they are the most discrete, defineable way
to stage the activity you've already thought through
-- you use a projects list, because you need an inventory of the stuff
you've got to think about
-- you use a tickler, because you sometimes need to defer thinking without
losing an idea
-- you use a waiting for list, because you need to keep other things in
play, but off the field, without further thinking
-- you use a someday/maybe list, to move ideas out of your head and queue
them up for possible "thinking" and "doing"
-- you keep an empty inbox, because unknown "stuff" creates doubt that
you've thought about the things you need to
-- you keep a hard landscape calendar, because "bogus" scheduling undermines
your clarity about priorities in the moment
-- you collect, because that's how you keep stuff out of your head
-- you process, because that how you front-load thinking
-- you organize, because it wastes time to re-collect or re-process
-- you review, because you need to maintain the right balance between
thinking and doing
The Weather Man release -- you do, because that's what get's stuff done
周回顾是GTD里面不可缺少的一项，而目标设定也是人生管理中非常重要的环节。这两样东西具有相同的特性：
